Burn Notice: “Fearless Leader”
25 June 2009
by R.A. Porter

And so the saga, nay the tragedy, of Detective Paxson comes to a close. I’m surprised she didn’t literally whimper as she trudged off the screen. For a show that rarely missteps, Paxson was a rolled ankle, stubbed toe, and nail fungus wrapped in a somewhat pretty package.1
After the first two episodes of the Paxson arc I thought Bloodgood and her character showed some promise; seeing how the arc played itself out I’ve had to reconsider my position. I was wrong, wrong, wrong. Imdb only has Bloodgood listed for the three episodes in which she’s already appeared, indicating this arc is complete, though I expect we’ll see her later this half-season or sometime in the following half as an ally to Michael and the team. I do not look forward to her return.
At least we had some fun moments with Nick Turturro, my favorite being Fi’s lobster/bug line and the whole of the bush league smash and grab at the dry cleaners.
The Recap
Not a super episode but there was some fun to be had. Michael’s got a tail – which he can lose seemingly at will2 - making life difficult and dangerous now and for the future. In order to permanently lose the tail and cool Paxson’s interest in him he decides to help her take down the other guy she hassles non-stop.3
Michael gets in with Tommy to get close to the public enemy, Matheson. In the process he realizes Tommy’s a decent human being in way over his head with a ruthless thug. Bringing Tommy under his aegis is the natural reaction from this Michael. The Michael of three years ago might not have cared about Tommy’s survival, but his time in Miami and out of the spy game has returned a bit of humanity to him.
After the twists, turns, and setbacks of last week’s superior episode, this week was pretty humdrum. The stakes never felt particularly high and Matheson never seemed particularly dangerous. In the end he wasn’t this big bad Paxson and Tommy had made him out to be; he was just a smalltime hood running a little gang. As an anonymous commenter noted on Alan Sepinwall’s review, big bad Matheson is so smalltime he’s bagging meth on this big heist. A gangster should be sending in his henchmen while he sips mojitos on the beach.
Character
As if we didn’t already know Sam’s a great guy, we get confirmation in the guise of Stacey Conolly, IRS. It takes Sam a while to figure it out but an old baseball card amongst Stacey’s files triggers his memory of the young son of a woman he used to date.4 Of course Sam wanted to keep hanging out with the little guy after the breakup but mom wanted nothing to do with Sam; Stacey’s been going through life without a father figure or drinking sensei since.
If this is a one-shot it was a weak C-story5 for Sam. If Stacey is going to recur it could prove to be an interesting development. I’ll reserve judgment.
On the Fi front, things are cycling through a pattern we’ve seen before. Michael is out, free, unencumbered, and unwatched. Fi wants him to stay that way even though Michael knows full well someone else will surely be coming after him next without an agency’s protection. She’s not thinking of consequences, only of her wants and needs. Something’s got to give.
Chin Bits
- “It’s been building up for a while. Something about deducting mojitos.”
- “Alrighty! Can you bring us another spoon? You’re not going to eat that cherry, are you?”
- “Time to deploy the Sam Axe arsenal.”
- “There was this thing…and then the gun didn’t have an owner anymore.”
- “I have a headache in my eye.”
- “You were the little boy with the girl name.”
- “By standing in between them?”
- “It’s called a fuzzy navel. It’s not really my kind of thing but we’ve got to start you off easy. Work your way up to the good stuff.”
Important Lessons in Spycraft
- “To the educated eye, a prison tat tells a story. Where you did time. Why you did time. And who you did it with. It’s a little like a job resume for criminals.”
- “Every kid who ever went to a new school knows the secret to fitting in: copy everyone else. Spies do the same thing.”
- “If you really need to make a point, sometimes there’s no substitute for a good shiner.”
- Placing a bug on someone is easier “if they always carry something you can reproduce.”
- “Superglue is cheap, quiet, and powerful. Lay it on thick and force dry it with canned air and you can cut bonding time to less than a minute.”
Final Thoughts
Wow. You know sometimes I’ll watch an episode a couple of times to put together one of these recaps and on the second or third viewing I’ll start to appreciate it a lot more than on first viewing. A good episode will suddenly reveal itself to be a very good episode. Tonight is a first. I actually think this episode was worse now that I’ve rewatched and written this. Why? Easy enough to figure out. Take a look at the lessons in spycraft. Michael’s voiceovers, usually so entertaining and interesting, could not possibly have been more banal and boring. What’s worse is that they’re not even well written.
Every kid who ever went to a new school knows the secret to fitting in: copy everyone else.
Really? Every . . ever . . . . . everyone? If it had a nice meter to it I could excuse the repeating pattern but it doesn’t. It’s begging for a red pen.
Oh well. There have to be duds to make us better appreciate the brightly glowing gems like last week. But what a fall, to go from the Cantenna to “superglue is sticky.”
On a personal note, sorry about taking last week off. I’ve been slammed at my paying gig of late and needed a little break. I’ll do my best not to miss any more of the summer’s great offerings, especially not ones as phenomenal as “End Run”. If you want my take on it, think how much you enjoyed it triple it.
R.A. Porter is an aspiring television writer who currently toils away in the software mines. He can be found at Sketch War, his personal blog, Tumblr, and stalked on Twitter.- If you think that metaphor’s tough to parse, you should see the convoluted mess it was *before* the edit. [↩]
- I’d like to comment here on how silly Paxson’s approach is. It’s trivial – really frighteningly so in most jurisdictions – to get a legal warrant to secretly install a GPS tracker on a vehicle. After all, when your car is on the road it’s in the public and you’ve “given up your expectation of privacy.” It’s less exciting than the mano a mano scenes of cop and suspect we’ve all come to expect but it’s better police work. A real detective would have quietly gotten the warrant and would keep track of Michael’s wherabouts from afar. Which could have led to an interesting hack from Michael to jam the GPS or trick it or remove it undetected. Oh well. [↩]
- Yeah, it would be pretty easy for Michael to convince the department that this cop – who already has a complaint for harassing a suspect – was harassing him as well. More unusual sloppiness from the writers. [↩]
- And I’ll say it for the third and final time tonight…Stacey’s mom has got it goin’ on. [↩]
- B prime? [↩]
Tags: fuse entertainment, USA Network
posted by R.A. Porter in → Reviews
June 26th, 2009 at 9:52 pm
I think this show is good,but could even better.
June 29th, 2009 at 8:36 pm
Unfortunately, the Paxson character never really worked which was a first on this show. We never got a good sense on why she, of all the detectives in Miami, was so hell bent on singlehandedly bringing Michael to justice.
If the writers had worked in some type of backstory where Michael indirectly hurt her/pissed her off in some way (Michael helped bust one of her best street informants or he forced someone she cared about out of Miami, etc.), it would’ve been understandable. If she was somehow linked to his former "management" and they instructed her to open up this huge investigation, even that would have made some sense. But without a reason beyond "there have been a lot of explosions and car cashes in Miami since you arrived" doesn't cut it. Umm, writers… how did Paxon even know when Michael first arrived in Miami? One simple line of dialog would have sufficed.
Another USA series that I occasionally watch, In Plain Sight, had a similar plot with an FBI agent ruthlessly determined to arrest the main characters sister for murder, kidnapping and drug trafficking. In that show (and in only one episode) the writers were able to link a good reason to why this guy possessed this singular vendetta. In Burn Notice we got no such realistic explanation.
Hopefully the show will bounce back with a better episode after the holiday weekend.
June 29th, 2009 at 8:43 pm
PS:
R.A., you were missed buddy. This is the first place I check after watching Burn Notice. Glad you're back.
Now perhaps you'll give us your final thoughts on the last two episodes of Pushing Daisies? What did you think about the altered ending to "Kerplunk"?
June 29th, 2009 at 8:49 pm
I think I was too heartbroken to write about PD's final two but they were good. Nice and solid and I thought the revised ending with the flyover and voiceover from Jim Dale worked well enough. Since most of the remaining viewers are unlikely to be headed out to their local nerd emporia to pick up the comic when it comes out, I think they needed to do that.
For the nerds amongst us, it'll probably make it easier for them to jump the story forward a bit without too much catching up.
My only real complaint was something probably outside everyone's control. I wish Alfredo had come back and been Olive's love interest. I assume Raul Esparza was too busy to make it back in the second season.
June 30th, 2009 at 4:22 pm
I enjoyed the episode, mostly because the interaction between Michael and Tommy – all Tommy scenes were a real treat. I agree that everything went down too easily, too smoothly to provide much suspense. Definitely not as good as last week.
.
Count me on the team that DIDN'T LIKE the stupid Paxon arc. I thought that it was handled really badly. I like Moon Bloodgood, but she was irritating here and never posed much of an actual threat to Michael – she was a one-note annoyance, a minor hitch in his get-along, and was a boring character. If she were to have more appearances, and this whole switch-up developed into them becoming reluctant allies, then I would withhold judgment to see how it developed – but if this is it, then Epic Fail. But her relentless harassment against Michael, with little-to-no actual evidence, seemed over-the-top. I did like how effectively he backed her into a corner – but she gave up way too quickly, for someone who had been so single-mindedly anti-Michael in the past. I would have rather seen her be an actual threat, a real adversary to Michael (like, maybe if she hadn't been so freaking obvious with all the threatening and stalking she could have actually caught him doing something). But as it was, there was basically no challenge, and Paxon came off seeming like an idiot. If they had started off slowly, and built things gradually, showing how Paxon was quietly gathering intel on Michael's operations (giving her a real basis for her suspicions), with some quality back-n-forth Paxon-Weston spying on each other, and her interfering in his cases by watching him and intervening with law enforcement in ways that threatened his actual goals, the arc could have been more of a success.
June 30th, 2009 at 9:27 pm
Agreed.
Even though the beginning was a little rough, in retrospect, I really enjoyed the way the writers handled the Carla character over the course of the second season. I loved all those great Carla and Michael conversations, especially the post Michael's-flat-goes-boom episodes when Carla began making personal one-on-one visits to Michael’s place.
I do like Moon Bloodgood. She was good on Journeyman [*sigh*] and can certainly play the badass, tough woman role as seen in Terminator Salvation.
Lastly, while I absolutely love the show, I wonder if it's going to be somewhat of a challenge for Burn Notice to top the overall excellence of season two, specifically the delayed second half (season 2.5?). Will the show reach a point where the case of the week and various lessons in spy craft ever become slightly repetitive?
As a fan, I hope not.
July 25th, 2009 at 4:05 pm
I searched on google and I had a hard time located the right info….until I found your blog.