<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Virtuality Premiere, Pilot, or One and Done?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dreamloom.com/reviews/virtuality-premiere-pilot-or-one-and-done/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dreamloom.com/reviews/virtuality-premiere-pilot-or-one-and-done/</link>
	<description>a modern cahiers du television: deep thoughts on a shallow medium.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 19:38:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: DALLAS</title>
		<link>http://www.dreamloom.com/reviews/virtuality-premiere-pilot-or-one-and-done/comment-page-1/#comment-1649</link>
		<dc:creator>DALLAS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2010 11:32:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wwwold.dreamloom.com/?p=8400#comment-1649</guid>
		<description>Excuse, that I interfere, but it is necessary for me little bit more information.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excuse, that I interfere, but it is necessary for me little bit more information.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sarah D. Scoon</title>
		<link>http://www.dreamloom.com/reviews/virtuality-premiere-pilot-or-one-and-done/comment-page-1/#comment-1647</link>
		<dc:creator>Sarah D. Scoon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Feb 2010 10:28:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wwwold.dreamloom.com/?p=8400#comment-1647</guid>
		<description>Hey nice post.
About the Volkswagen Phaeton, can you believe it&#039;s nothing more then a reskinned Bentley Continental GT? Sad, but true.
The VW Phaeton was a unimaginable fail in my opinion!

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.whatnottodrive.com/2010/02/vw-phaeton-hey-volkswagen-you-were-kiddin-right/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Its Official: VW Phaeton is a total flop!&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey nice post.<br />
About the Volkswagen Phaeton, can you believe it&#8217;s nothing more then a reskinned Bentley Continental GT? Sad, but true.<br />
The VW Phaeton was a unimaginable fail in my opinion!</p>
<p><a href="http://www.whatnottodrive.com/2010/02/vw-phaeton-hey-volkswagen-you-were-kiddin-right/" rel="nofollow">Its Official: VW Phaeton is a total flop!</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kemo</title>
		<link>http://www.dreamloom.com/reviews/virtuality-premiere-pilot-or-one-and-done/comment-page-1/#comment-1642</link>
		<dc:creator>kemo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Aug 2009 06:53:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wwwold.dreamloom.com/?p=8400#comment-1642</guid>
		<description>Yes, the science wasn&#039;t perfect but regarding your criticism:

- command structure: international private consortium build the ship and hired the crew, so you can&#039;t compare the command structure to the US military. and it&#039;s the future, things can change a lot in 50 years.
- we don&#039;t know enough about the bombs to judge the radiation or emp radius (could be pure fusion explosive).
- the pusher plate seems fine to me. with the right materials and bombs it could work.

all in all i think the Phaeton is, for a tv series, a very realistic space ship, at least the exterior. we (the human race) could built something like it by 2050 (at least for interplanetary travel), if we&#039;d really want to.

i mean with a 5% budget (currently it&#039;s 0.5% of the federal budget), 2 decades and no political restrictions (partial test ban treaty etc.) NASA could most likely travel to mars in a matter of weeks instead of 9 months. it&#039;s just economics and politics that hold us back (at least for interplanetary travel).

Nice official diagrams of the Phaeton can be found here:
&lt;a href=&quot;http://drexfiles.wordpress.com/2009/06/29/virtuality-vfx-and-the-good-ship-phaeton/&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://drexfiles.wordpress.com/2009/06/29/virtual...&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, the science wasn&#039;t perfect but regarding your criticism:</p>
<p>- command structure: international private consortium build the ship and hired the crew, so you can&#039;t compare the command structure to the US military. and it&#039;s the future, things can change a lot in 50 years.<br />
- we don&#039;t know enough about the bombs to judge the radiation or emp radius (could be pure fusion explosive).<br />
- the pusher plate seems fine to me. with the right materials and bombs it could work.</p>
<p>all in all i think the Phaeton is, for a tv series, a very realistic space ship, at least the exterior. we (the human race) could built something like it by 2050 (at least for interplanetary travel), if we&#039;d really want to.</p>
<p>i mean with a 5% budget (currently it&#039;s 0.5% of the federal budget), 2 decades and no political restrictions (partial test ban treaty etc.) NASA could most likely travel to mars in a matter of weeks instead of 9 months. it&#039;s just economics and politics that hold us back (at least for interplanetary travel).</p>
<p>Nice official diagrams of the Phaeton can be found here:<br />
<a href="http://drexfiles.wordpress.com/2009/06/29/virtuality-vfx-and-the-good-ship-phaeton/" target="_blank" rel="nofollow"></a><a href="http://drexfiles.wordpress.com/2009/06/29/virtual.." rel="nofollow">http://drexfiles.wordpress.com/2009/06/29/virtual..</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stargate Atlantis</title>
		<link>http://www.dreamloom.com/reviews/virtuality-premiere-pilot-or-one-and-done/comment-page-1/#comment-1641</link>
		<dc:creator>Stargate Atlantis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2009 23:41:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wwwold.dreamloom.com/?p=8400#comment-1641</guid>
		<description>Like to watch Stargate  and also Lost. I found your blog on google and read a few of your other posts. I just added you to my Google News Reader. Look forward to reading more from you in the future.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Like to watch Stargate  and also Lost. I found your blog on google and read a few of your other posts. I just added you to my Google News Reader. Look forward to reading more from you in the future.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tim</title>
		<link>http://www.dreamloom.com/reviews/virtuality-premiere-pilot-or-one-and-done/comment-page-1/#comment-1640</link>
		<dc:creator>tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2009 17:43:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wwwold.dreamloom.com/?p=8400#comment-1640</guid>
		<description>I might add that when walking in a rotating section of a space craft - to simulate gravity - you walk on the outer wall, not on the spoke inner wall, Jesus Christ !!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I might add that when walking in a rotating section of a space craft &#8211; to simulate gravity &#8211; you walk on the outer wall, not on the spoke inner wall, Jesus Christ !!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sharon E. Dreyer</title>
		<link>http://www.dreamloom.com/reviews/virtuality-premiere-pilot-or-one-and-done/comment-page-1/#comment-1639</link>
		<dc:creator>Sharon E. Dreyer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Jun 2009 17:11:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wwwold.dreamloom.com/?p=8400#comment-1639</guid>
		<description>Guess this pilot needs to learn to fly!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Guess this pilot needs to learn to fly!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
